Northeastern students stage AFSP Out of the Darkness Walk for suicide prevention

There was a slightly nervous edge to the energy in the air as the sun rose over Krentzman Quadrangle early Saturday morning, catching the deep blues and striking yellows of signs carefully planted around the grassy knoll at its center.  “Suicide prevention starts with everyday heroes like you,” read one, accompanied by a simple, forthright hashtag: “#stopsuicide.”

And for Northeastern University to host its first-ever Out of the Darkness Walk, a suicide prevention and advocacy event affiliated with and intended in part to fundraise for the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, a fair share of everyday heroes turned out to be necessary – including third-year psychology major Isabel Irizarry, who coordinated the walk, and fourth-year human services major Laney Chace, who aided in organizing it through student group Behind the SMILE.

Contacted after the event, which drew nearly 100 students to campus for a three-mile walk around the area followed by student speakers and performances, both Irizarry and Chace acknowledge they went into Saturday less than assured of success. Even on the morning of, after a fundraising period that had exceeded two established goals and $7,000, there was a great deal of uncertainty as to whether more than 75 Northeastern students who’d registered online would actually attend.

“I was nervous but I was also really energized, more than I’ve been most mornings recently,” says Irizarry, looking back on the morning of the walk. “But I channeled the nervousness into energy I could put forth into the effort of organizing it.”

But as the handful of Huskies gathering in the quad reached double digits, then kept growing, the organizers say initial nerves gave way to a sense of purpose in finally carrying out the walk on which she and others in Behind the SMILE had spearheaded planning for more than half a year.

“The walk was amazing,” says Chace, with a matter-of-fact tone to her reflection. “Everything came together.”

The earlier part of Saturday had been spent turning Krentzman Quad into something of a homebase for the walk. Across four tables at the edge of the quad were laid out two registration stations (one for those who had fundraised, and another for day-of walkers), water bottles and granola bars, and a collection of multi-colored bead necklaces intended to symbolically identify walkers with their connections to suicide.

White beads symbolized loss of a child, red signified loss of a spouse or partner, silver meant loss of a first responder or military member, and gold denoted loss of a parent. More commonly displayed at this walk, however, were orange (loss of a sibling), purple (loss of a relative/friend), blue (for general support of the cause), teal (for those whose loved ones struggle), and – poignantly – green (for those who’ve struggled personally).

As more students streamed in, many soon made their way to the bead table, lifting the decorative objects around their necks and identifying their own relationships with suicide. Some nodded and others smiled at those around them brandishing similar colors.

“The beads are such an important way to express your connection to the cause without having to vocalize it,” says Irizarry. “They allow for us to look around at each other and know we’ve had similar, shared experiences. There’s a lot of comfort in that.”

Following opening remarks by Irizarry and AFSP Eastern Massachusetts Associate Area Director Michele Lee, who’d aided to organizing the walk, Monica Marotta, a second-year ASL/English Interpreting major, took control of the mic to discuss her personal connection to suicide – the loss of her friend, Tom, who’d attended SUNY New Paltz with Marotta prior to her transferring to Northeastern, and her grieving process after his death by suicide.

As the sun rose and 10 a.m. rolled around, Irizarry took to a mic set up on the knoll and encouraged students to join her in a walk around campus. Accompanied by upbeat music playing from a portable mini speaker, she led attendees on a pre-arranged route that wove throughout the campus and streamed down the sidewalk of bustling Huntington Avenue, completing a circuit three times to reach an approximately three-mile length that AFSP has encouraged in all its Out of the Darkness Walks.

“I felt like all our hard work created a really moving and beautiful display of solidarity on campus,” says Irizarry, looking back on the walk itself.

When students reunited at Krentzman Quad, many chatting with friends and peers they’d encountered along the walk, Northeastern a cappella groups ascended atop the knoll for performances envisioned in line with the Walk’s overarching themes of strength, awareness, and perseverance. Distilled Harmony performed “Bird Set Free” by Sia, followed Pitch, Please! singing “The Lion, the Beast, the Beat” by Grace Potter and the Nocturnals.

“I think that having a cappella performers there was impactful because it showed their support and their personal ties to the cause,” says Chace. “We were happy to be able to have these performers there because they added a sense of light and hope to the event and showed how much then Northeastern community can come together to share their art and passion through a lens of mental health advocacy.”

Another group, the Unisons, sang an arrangement of “Safe Inside” by James Arthur, before the event’s final student speaker, fourth-year chemistry major Jenna Malley, took the stage. Speaking passionately and openly about her own loss – that of a close personal friend named Kennedy – Malley highlighted her work through the AMAZING Campaign (a grassroots effort she launched via AFSP’s website) to bring further awareness to suicide prevention and awareness of mental illness on college campuses.

With Malley’s speech concluded, a final a cappella group – the Nor’easters – came before the mic for an earnest arrangement of “September” by Earth, Wind, and Fire. For many members of that group, the event was keenly personal; a Nor’easter member died by suicide in 2015, leading the group to highlight suicide prevention publically and through fundraising efforts for AFSP.

As the closing notes of the performance rang out across the quad, Northeastern’s first Out of the Darkness Walk essentially concluded, with organizers coming before the mic to thank attendees before leaving students to mingle, converse, and eventually disperse.

“I could feel our Northeastern community coming together to talk and express passion for such an incredibly important cause that is often overlooked on this campus and in colleges across the country,” says Chace, looking back on the event. “I hope that we were able to spread our message about compassion and empathy, and that our community at Northeastern will become stronger and more transparent about mental health and suicide moving forward.”

For Irizarry, success in pulling off the walk felt simultaneously like the first step in a new chapter of mental health advocacy on campus. “My hope is that people feel more like there’s a space for them to discuss issues of mental illness and suicide,” she says. “It’s a small step but an important one, making sure people know there is a movement, and even though it might be in its first steps, I think that’s empowering.”

Boston-area colleges file amicus brief against Trump’s second immigration order

Seven Massachusetts colleges and universities made their opposition to the Trump administration’s continued attempts to implement a so-called “Muslim travel ban” known on Friday, joining a total of 31 schools across the nation in filing an amicus brief.

The brief, filed in the federal appeals court for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia (one of the courts that ruled against the ban), marks the second such legal action by universities in defense of nationals from six Muslim-majority nations, who under the attempted ban would be barred from entering the United States for 90 days.

“These individuals make significant contributions to their fields of study and to campus life by bringing their unique perspectives and talents to amici’s classrooms, laboratories, and performance spaces,” the brief read, adding that the executive order had indicated “from the highest levels of government, that discrimination is not only acceptable but appropriate.”

According to the brief, top educators and administrative figures at the colleges – which include Northeastern University, Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston University, Brandeis University and Tufts University – feel that the emergence of the ban, a legal manifestation of the Islamophobic, anti-immigrant rhetoric advocated by Trump on the campaign rhetoric, has impacted their ability to recruit global talent both in student and faculty populations.

The first ban, signed by Trump on Jan. 27, was shot down the following month by a court in Seattle, which criticized the ideology behind the bill in addition to its vague, sweeping wording. The most recent executive order, initiated March 6, was halted by a federal judge in Hawaii, who issued the decision hours before the ban would have gone into effect.

 

BU students, workers rally against Trump’s “corporate agenda”

Video Credit: The Daily Free Press

Marsh Chapel became a protest ground on Wednesday, March 1, as students and workers representing Boston University gathered to protest multiple aspects of the Trump administration, from ties to the fossil fuel industry to a demonstrated desire to further, in the words of protesters, “corporatize higher education.”

According to the Daily Free Press, approximately 100 protesters attended the rally, which was co-hosted by Divest BU, Massachusetts Interfaith Worker Justice, Make Boston University a Sanctuary School, and Student Labor Action Project at BU, all organizations that have been galvanized to action by stances taken by Trump’s White House.

Their goals? To push BU toward accepting “sanctuary campus” designation, divesting its endowment from the fossil fuel industry, and negotiating with faculty unions to improve conditions for faculty members and campus workers, as well as taking a more rigid stance about cracking down on instances of Islamophobia on campus.

One issue inflaming protesters was BU President Robert Brown’s recent refusal to hold a meeting with leaders of Divest BU, who’ve sent two members each day since January 31 to Brown’s office in hopes of engaging him face-to-face.

The group hopes to persuade members of BU’s Board of Trustees to divest endowment funds from the fossil fuel industry,  an agenda item that has been prominently thrust forward by fears of backward slides in addressing the climate change crisis following Trump’s election.

BU has taken some steps to address environmental concerns over the years, such as creating the Advisory Committee on Socially Responsible Investing (ACSRI) as well as (on that committee’s recommendation) a more recent task force, titled the Climate Action Plan, tasked with addressing ways to reduce energy use and actively aid in remedying environmental issues. However, BU has been loathe to take a firm stance against investments in the fossil fuel industry, only stating that it would endorse avoiding such investments on a “best efforts” basis, the Daily Free Press reported last month.

Divest BU has been dissatisfied with Brown’s response to their demands, explaining that the university has yet to incorporate one of the ACSRI’s proposals: divesting from “companies that continue to explore for fossil fuel reserves of any kind.”

At the rally, The Daily Free Press interviewed Masha Vernik, a BU sophomore and member of Divest BU, who said:

“I am not a profit margin, President Brown. I am a community member whose voice must be heard if we want this university to make the right decisions to benefit us and the world around us.”

Protesters pushed for progress on other issues plaguing BU’s campus. A speaker addressing amending BU’s current practice of negotiating semester-to-semester deals with adjuncts that don’t address disparities in course prices, and asked the university to address widely alleged unfair treatment of faculty and staff across campus.

The issue of “sanctuary campuses” has spread across the United States since the inauguration. Though such designation is largely symbolic, activists in favor of schools naming themselves “sanctuary campuses” for undocumented students and workers say that support of the movement conveys a willingness to defend such individuals targeted by  the administration’s discriminatory policies. BU currently lacks any policy designed to protect undocumented students and workers – a point protesters repeatedly addressed.

As Trump rescinds protections, colleges and students reaffirm transgender rights

As the Trump administration continues its assault on civil liberties for marginalized populations, students across the Boston area are rallying in defense of rights for various at-risk groups of Americans, among them Muslims, immigrants, and – over the past two weeks – the transgender community.

Last Wednesday, Feb. 22, the administration, overcoming initial opposition from Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, rolled back federal protections for transgender students that had previously safeguarded their ability to use whichever bathroom corresponded with their gender identity. The guidelines, enacted by preceding President Barack Obama in May in accordance with Title IX protections had been met with praise from the transgender community – and their retraction sparked protests across the country.

Students from Boston colleges were among the attendees at a rally in Post Office Square that formed the next evening and marched through Downtown Crossing, according to WHDH. Boston Public Schools Superintendent Tommy Chang released a statement supporting the rescinded “bathroom bill,” stating:

“While the federal government has rescinded its guidance protecting transgender students in our nation’s schools, transgender and gender nonconforming students in the Boston Public Schools will remain protected from discrimination, bullying and harassment.”

On university campuses, protest spread.

“I wish we didn’t have to tell the world that trans rights matter,” said Harvard student Sheehan D. Scarborough, director of the school’s Office of BGLTQ Student Life, to a dozens-strong crowd that gathered in Harvard Yard this past Monday, Feb. 27. As reported by the Harvard Crimson, the Harvard protest was organized by the school’s Trans Task Force and was intended as a cathartic expression of anger and dismay more than a concrete rally to further a policy response.

The Harvard Islamic Society and the Black Students Association, both also student groups at Harvard, joined in solidarity.

At Suffolk University, Acting President Marisa Kelly opined that the university would continue to support the bathroom bill despite Trump’s decision.

In the email, quoted by The Suffolk Journal, she wrote:

“While I am disappointed with the decision to roll the directive back, please be assured that the federal change will have no direct effect on students here at Suffolk, nor should it affect students while in Massachusetts.”

More protests are expected to take place in coming days across Boston-area campuses.

CC: Ludovic Bertron, Creative Commons.

Divest NU mounts pipeline protest

Around a dozen Northeastern University students allied with Divest NU are repurposing pipelines in the name of protest, reports The Huntington News.

On Wednesday, Feb. 24, around college students marched down Forsyth Street and spilled into Centennial Common, carrying a “mock pipeline” (in actuality a black inflatable tube) above their heads with the slogans “Divest from climate chaos” and “Aoun – don’t be a fossil fool” scrawled on it in white.

As per the below video, which Divest NU posted to Facebook, the students were led by club members with megaphones, who initiated chants like, “Hey, hey, ho, ho, fossil fuels have got to go.”

The action, in part galvanized by Northeastern’s School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs voting unanimously in favor of divestment earlier in the week, is one of several recently undertaken by Divest NU, which has enjoyed swelling membership and public interest with the twin trending topics of the Standing Rock protests and climate change drawing a significant amount of attention to the organization’s anti-fossil-fuel agenda. The organization’s coalition of students, faculty, student organizations, and alumni has now convinced five schools to vote in favor of divesting college and university endowments from fossil fuel companies.

 

Here’s more, as per The Huntington News:

“This march is the beginning of our re-entering into the campus discussion on divestment, and restarting the conversation on our goals,” said Meghan McCallister, DivestNU member and a freshman environmental science and political science double major. “This semester we have a lot of people returning on campus from co-op and N.U.in so we think it’s important to re-engage people who weren’t able to engage with us last semester.”

Holding the administration accountable

Small steps are sometimes all we have.

To a politically active student on an exceptionally international college campus in one of America’s most liberal cities during what has been the most politically tumultuous year in decades, it can be discouraging to note the calculated inexactitude of President Joseph E. Aoun’s community addresses. These e-mail communiqués, typically distributed in the wake of a national tragedy or inflaming event, don’t err on the side of caution so much as wallow in platitude.

For example, in October, Hurricane Matthew’s destruction in Haiti garnered an e-mail from Aoun, calling for members of the university to “take action to support our community members” and urged students to offer assistance. Had the university followed up with any concrete or financial shows of solidarity with the devastated nation, the message would have rung a little less hollow.

The next month, a noted racist, xenophobe and chauvinist was elected president, marking the conclusion of a grueling, dispiriting campaign fueled by white supremacy, patent falsehood and pervasive scapegoating of minorities. Evidently loath to condemn the then-president-elect in any certain terms, despite the formerly apolitical repugnance of what his run for the White House had unleashed on public discourse, Aoun instead penned a paean to the university’s “inclusive and mutually respectful worldview.”

The vagueness of his gesture drew rightful criticism from on-campus group Students Against Institutional Discrimination (SAID), which released a letter calling for Aoun and the Northeastern administration to specifically condemn the bigotry and deleterious vitriol of the president-elect’s campaign—as well as the appointment of a noted white nationalist, Stephen Bannon, to his inner circle.

“Unified, respectful and inclusive communities are not created by chance,” the letter read. “Northeastern will need to do much more than send a five paragraph-long e-mail to truly create the type of community it boasts.”

Since then, Aoun has failed to respond to any of the steps laid forth by SAID in its letter, skirting around declaring Northeastern a “sanctuary campus” and taking no concrete steps to make Northeastern the safe space as which it often self-identifies. In many ways, he has looked beyond the pressing demands of the student body. He has not assigned an office or administrators to assist students affected by Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and others lacking the privilege of citizenship (beyond WeCare), nor has he explicitly opposed the appointment of any nominees to President Donald J. Trump’s cabinet or administration.

And yet, as the Trump administration has blundered and blathered its way through its first month, Aoun may be on the verge of finding his tongue.

On Jan. 28, the Northeastern president released an e-mail addressing the executive order widely known as the Muslim Ban, acknowledging that its implementation came amid “times of distressing change and uncertainty” while reaffirming that Northeastern would continue to serve as a global community. Though adopting the same vague, non-offensive stance his past e-mails have taken, the communication at least made an attempt to address the culture of consternation Trump’s discriminatory worldview and policymaking has heightened. Luckily, it wouldn’t be Aoun’s final word on the subject.

Last Friday, Northeastern joined seven other universities in filing an amicus brief opposing Trump’s executive order on immigration, calling it in a sharply worded weekend letter “antithetical to our core values and completely unacceptable” while noting the university’s personal stake in the matter (with the ban affecting 250 Northeastern students and 31 faculty and staff members).

“To the 250 Northeastern students and 31 faculty and staff impacted by this executive order: Your story is my story,” said Aoun in the letter. “You have my unwavering pledge that your university will stand by you, safeguard you and be your home away from home.”

Let’s be clear: Aoun’s letter cannot be the end of his correspondence on this matter. The e-mail lacks specificity in terms of its failure to declare Northeastern a sanctuary campus, to propose tangible steps to support affected individuals or to unambiguously condemn the Islamophobic, isolationist rhetoric that constitutes the hateful undercurrent of this order.

And yet to a frequent critic of the administration, one disillusioned by its imprecise wording and demonstrated reluctance to take strong, proactive stances on key issues that directly impact its community members, Northeastern’s part so far in responding to the executive order holds a glimmer of promise. Whatever comes of the brief, and the lawsuit it pertains to (Louhghalam v. Trump, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts), such a movement by a notoriously sluggish administration indicates that Northeastern may be more than a passive bystander in the fight for civil liberties set to unfold across the next four, perhaps eight years.

Furthermore, Aoun’s unexpectedly forthright tone indicates a potentially shifting administration, one that understands the value of confrontation. Sometimes small steps are all we have—and this is one. Northeastern is finally showing awareness that both its global community and the international reputation on which it’s built its reputation are under direct, ongoing threat. And if the school is to keep either, one thing is resolutely clear: It’s going to have to fight for them.

CC: Monika M. Wahi

Sally Yates fired as attorney general after defying Trump’s Muslim ban

In the midst of the controversy over the Trump administration’s executive order barring immigrants and refugees from seven Muslim-majority countries, Attorney General Sally Yates took a largely symbolic stand against the ban, ordering the Justice Department not to defend it in court. What followed was a violent, brusque dismissal that holds echoes of the Saturday Night Massacre.

At Copley Square protest, unity and volume in the face of Trump’s unconstitutional travel ban

Thousands took to Copley Square on Sunday to loudly protest the Trump administration’s ban on travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries in the aftermath of a tumultuous night that saw federal judges from Boston and elsewhere stay parts of the order, which has been disavowed by many key politicians as unconstitutional.

Covering the protest on Twitter meant trying to capture the size and sensation of the protest, as well as individual gestures, protesters, quotes, and political statements made non-verbally. The immediacy of the platform lends itself to such an electric, dynamic setting – but the issues of uploading to Twitter in the midst of a dense crowd, almost all members of which are also online, means that some creativity in where a reporter places themselves is necessary.

Here are some highlights from Twitter, displaying swelling crowds, creative signs, and a prevailing spirit of perseverance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Boston-area colleges fail to embrace “sanctuary campus” movement

The election of Donald J. Trump has sparked nationwide calls by students to designate college campuses as sanctuary locations for the undocumented immigrants he has pledged to deport. And yet, despite advocacy within Boston-area universities aimed at getting colleges to formally declare themselves part of that movement, multiple administrations have proven slow or unwilling to embrace sanctuary status.

At Northeastern, initial demands by students to dub the university a sanctuary campus were met with an email from President Joseph Aoun calling for “unity, inclusion and respect” in response to the election, according to the Huntington News. Student groups like SAID (Students Against Institutional Discrimination) criticized his note as vague and called on him to name Northeastern a sanctuary campus – a demand that as of months later has gone unmet.

The sanctuary campus movement, a mirror of the wider sanctuary city movement that caught fire late last year after Trump’s controversial victory in the election, has called upon institutions of higher learning to label themselves protective environments for undocumented students, workers, and faculty. Such individuals would be impacted by the anti-immigrant policies that constituted a central focus of Trump’s campaign. Sanctuary schools would work to protect undocumented immigrants in their communities from deportations and raids by federal immigration authorities, through refusal to work with such authorities and other forms of active resistance.

In addition to Northeastern, students at Tufts University, UMASS Boston, Harvard University, Boston College, Boston University, MIT, Boston Conservatory, Emmanuel College, MassArt, and Berklee College of Music all signed petitions and held protests calling for their universities to become sanctuaries, according to a crowdsourced map of Boston on Fusion.

Like at Northeastern, student advocates for such designation have been met with lukewarm responses, if any at all.

BU President Robert Brown addressed in December a petition circulated at his school in December that called for a withholding of support for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, including by prohibiting the agency from entering campus.

“This is not a promise we can make, as the University must obey the applicable state and federal laws,” Brown wrote, as quoted in the Daily Free Press. “I can, however, assure you that the Boston University Police Department does not currently play any role in the enforcement of such laws and will not voluntarily assist the federal government in immigration enforcement.”

Harvard University President Drew Faust rejected the label altogether. “Sanctuary campus status has no legal significance or even clear definition,” Faust said in December, in a statement quoted by The Harvard Crimson. “It offers no actual protection to our students. I worry that in fact it offers false and misleading assurance.”

For many students and faculty, many of whom had backed the movement, Faust’s decision came as a disappointment. Allyson R. Perez, an organizer with Harvard’s Protect Undocumented Students group, spoke to the Crimson about it, calling the choice “extremely frustrating.”

As of press time, none of Boston’s top university administrations have accepted sanctuary status.

Harvard, MIT, Tufts, Boston University, and Northeastern administrators have all spoken in defense of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which protects undocumented immigrants who arrived as children. Trump has repeatedly promised to dissolve the program, which was put in place by preceding President Barack Obama.