As need for counseling rises, UHCS lags in resources, accessiblity

When Julia Cooper first walked through the glass doors of Northeastern’s University Health and Counseling Services (UHCS), the fourth-year psychology major was seeking relief from a depression that had settled like a leaden shawl around her shoulders. Cooper, despite struggling severely at the time, held out hope for her appointment with a behavioral health clinician.

And yet, behind closed doors, Cooper’s initial optimism turned quickly to dismay when she said the counselor started asking unsettling questions.

“She asked why I felt depressed and, when I told her I didn’t know, she said I should figure that out before seeking therapy,” Cooper recalls, voicing anger at how the appointment conveyed to her that clinicians employed by the university could offer little by way of real support.

The rhetoric its clinicians espoused then and in appointments with other students that Cooper has since heard from, she says, reflected a counseling center understaffed, overwhelmed and altogether unable to appropriately address the concerns students were carrying through its doors.

Instead of guiding her through steps to see a counselor on campus, the clinician seemed immediately fixated on leading Cooper off campus for help, looping in a referral coordinator to establish points of contact in the counseling community beyond campus.

“I was only taking three classes at the time and not working but the referrals they gave me only had openings during my class times, or were no longer practicing,” says Cooper. “I’m lucky enough to have good health insurance so I found therapy on my own.”

Since her experience, Cooper has begun to view the resources on campus – specifically the school’s short-term approach to counseling – with a more critical eye, joining mental health advocacy club Behind the SMILE and pushing for an infrastructural shift in how the university is addressing students’ mental health issues.


Northeastern currently utilizes a “short-term therapy” model, which limits students to seeing a therapist for six to 10 visits, or up to a semester, then refers them off-campus. It’s far from the only university to do so, but with surging demand for services forcing appointments to be spaced out to a month apart, semesters often run out before 10 sessions can even take place.

A 2014 survey of college counseling centers sponsored by the American College Counseling Association (ACCA) found that 30 percent of centers limit the number of counseling sessions students are allowed, while 43 percent don’t specify a limit on sessions but advertise themselves as short-term counseling services. Only 28 percent of centers tend to treat students until their issues are resolved in addition to referring them to off-campus resources.

Exacerbating Northeastern’s counseling issues is a drastic shortage of clinicians to treat the mental health issues of a huge student body. As per UHCS’ website, only nine permanent behavioral health clinicians are on staff to address the needs of roughly 20,000 students, including graduate and undergraduate students, establishing a ratio of one counselor for every 2,222 students. That ratio surpasses the university average of one counselor for every 2,081 students referenced in the ACCA’s findings.

“The school most of all needs to hire more therapists, so that the ones they have are not too busy to give quality care,” Cooper says. “They recognize these problems and have the money to take those actions, so there’s really no excuse for why they haven’t yet.”

Joining Cooper in her criticism of UHCS’ setup, including its tendency to refer students out to external therapists rather than hire more clinicians to treat students on campus, is fourth-year human services major Laney Chace, also involved in Behind the SMILE.

“What I think is particularly problematic [about the short-term therapy approach] is the fact that you can be set up with a different therapist every time you have an appointment at UHCS so you really have no chance to build up any rapport with the person you’re seeing,” she explains. “Then you have to leave and start over with a new person.”

Chace echoes Cooper in identifying flaws in the referral process as well.

“The lists of referrals are not updated,” she says, meaning students already in crisis are often directed toward long-term counselors no longer practicing in the area or not open to taking multiple types of insurance. “Using it, people are often not able to be hooked up with a long-term therapist.”


Chace and Cooper, aside from being far from alone in voicing frustration by UHCS, are just two students among of an increasing number who feel failed by the current state of resources.

American colleges and universities across the board are experiencing a rise in demand for counseling so dramatic that experts, including Dr. Gregg Henriques, consider higher education to be in the midst of “a full-on mental health crisis.”

Henriques, a psychology professor at James Madison University in Viriginia who has written multiple articles for “Psychology Today” about how mental illness is mushrooming on college campuses, says that colleges are growing steadily aware of data that indicates a 300 percent increase in visible mental health problems in college students over the past three years. Cases of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-injury and suicidal ideation are all on the rise – and administrations know it. What they’re doing to combat the issue, however, is a different matter entirely.

“The administrations do not want lots of attention drawn to mental health issues or to talk about any numbers about their own institution,” says Henriques by phone, of the culture around mental illness that many school employees perpetuate. “They downplay or are reticent to disclose if there has been a suicide attempt.”

Henriques says that, often, colleges’ unwillingness to devote time and resources to combatting mental health issues comes down to fear of bad press.

“No one wants to say, “Hey, come to JMU, this is our suicide rate,’” he says.

Much of aiding students on campus comes down to reforming administrations’ faulty belief that increased rates of mental illness on their campus reflects a singular failure on the part of their school’s academic systems, rather than a complex mix of societal and individual conditions.

“You have to try to reduce some stigma around suicide on campuses,” says Henriques. “We also need to be working on educating people about emotions and about optimal mental health versus what is mental illness… I think psychology has done a very bad job, and psychiatry has done a worse job, of helping people understand what I call the ‘neurotic conditions,’ which are anxiety and depression, and living in stress, dysfunction and relational conflict. These are the things that are pressing the university counseling centers.”

Henriques impresses that short-term therapy mechanisms are an ineffectual, sometimes harmful approach to “Band-Aiding” mental health issues in college student populations. The accelerating rates of mental health crises on college campuses, he says, suggests a need for from-the-ground-up reform.

In pushing for better treatment of mental health issues on campus, Henriques accepts that some universities will never devote adequate funds to establish long-term counseling for students on campus. However, he insists that the need for better resources is growing – and universities who don’t pay attention to the data and advice of mental health professionals risk increased rates of suicide on their campuses.

“We need to think about a socially coordinated move,” Henriques says, involving not just counseling services but higher education as a whole. “We need community-wide initiatives to spread awareness, centers for well-being on campus, educational models for thinking about well-being – that’s how you start establishing a culture of care.”


At Northeastern, Cooper and Chace hope student groups like Behind the SMILE are helping students in mental health crisis, and that such students are benefiting from initiatives like the student-run textline Lean on Me Huntington that launched this spring and an American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP)-affiliated Out of the Darkness Walk for Suicide Prevention held on campus earlier this month.

However, both indicate a sense of disappointment in UHCS’ rhetoric and treatment of students coming in often in states of severe distress.

“It was about two years ago when I went and I was super depressed,” recalls Cooper of the experience that opened her eyes about the center’s inadequate resources. “That appointment was the only time I left my bed that week – I don’t think it hugely impacted my mental health only because I knew what [the counselor] said wasn’t true, because I already knew a lot about depression and mental health, but I don’t think I would have sought therapy if that weren’t the case.”

It’s dangerous, Cooper says, for a school’s counseling services to send inaccurate or half-formed messages to students struggling with mental illness.

“Therapy was the main thing that helped me recover from depression,” she says. “I don’t know where I would be if I thought I had to figure out depression on my own before going.”

James Duffy
“When I’m at a particularly low point, I’ll get on the website and think that I really need to talk to someone and set up a meeting. But the way I’m feeling, I don’t want to call someone to set something up – and it’s interesting that, if I had a sore throat or I broke my arm, I’d be able to send an email to make a meeting and they’d give me one, but with mental health issues, I’d have to speak to someone… There are certain points where I think I need help, and it’s hard to physically say that to someone.” – James Duffy, third-year journalism major
IMG_0295
“I’ve had a referral list with names that have been misspelled, and with numbers that aren’t real numbers, which were totally unreliable.” – Mike Avender, fourth-year human services major
IMG_0309
“I’ve never used the services there. I’ve never heard good things about it from people, especially about a long waiting list to be seen. No one I know of has ever managed to use it continuously.” – Shannon O’Callaghan, fifth-year sociology/anthropology major
IMG_0311
“I never even knew we had a counseling center, to be honest. They’ve done a really bad job advertising its existence. “ – Nigel Gamarra, freshman, undeclared
IMG_0313
“Students view UHCS pretty negatively. I’ve known people for physical ailments, who’ve broken their foot, who are waiting in the waiting room for four hours.” – Alex Kokenis, third-year film studies major
IMG_0316
“[UHCS} made me not want to seek help just because of how hard it was to get it, which was frustrating.” – Seamus McGinley, third-year physics major

 

Northeastern students stage AFSP Out of the Darkness Walk for suicide prevention

There was a slightly nervous edge to the energy in the air as the sun rose over Krentzman Quadrangle early Saturday morning, catching the deep blues and striking yellows of signs carefully planted around the grassy knoll at its center.  “Suicide prevention starts with everyday heroes like you,” read one, accompanied by a simple, forthright hashtag: “#stopsuicide.”

And for Northeastern University to host its first-ever Out of the Darkness Walk, a suicide prevention and advocacy event affiliated with and intended in part to fundraise for the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, a fair share of everyday heroes turned out to be necessary – including third-year psychology major Isabel Irizarry, who coordinated the walk, and fourth-year human services major Laney Chace, who aided in organizing it through student group Behind the SMILE.

Contacted after the event, which drew nearly 100 students to campus for a three-mile walk around the area followed by student speakers and performances, both Irizarry and Chace acknowledge they went into Saturday less than assured of success. Even on the morning of, after a fundraising period that had exceeded two established goals and $7,000, there was a great deal of uncertainty as to whether more than 75 Northeastern students who’d registered online would actually attend.

“I was nervous but I was also really energized, more than I’ve been most mornings recently,” says Irizarry, looking back on the morning of the walk. “But I channeled the nervousness into energy I could put forth into the effort of organizing it.”

But as the handful of Huskies gathering in the quad reached double digits, then kept growing, the organizers say initial nerves gave way to a sense of purpose in finally carrying out the walk on which she and others in Behind the SMILE had spearheaded planning for more than half a year.

“The walk was amazing,” says Chace, with a matter-of-fact tone to her reflection. “Everything came together.”

The earlier part of Saturday had been spent turning Krentzman Quad into something of a homebase for the walk. Across four tables at the edge of the quad were laid out two registration stations (one for those who had fundraised, and another for day-of walkers), water bottles and granola bars, and a collection of multi-colored bead necklaces intended to symbolically identify walkers with their connections to suicide.

White beads symbolized loss of a child, red signified loss of a spouse or partner, silver meant loss of a first responder or military member, and gold denoted loss of a parent. More commonly displayed at this walk, however, were orange (loss of a sibling), purple (loss of a relative/friend), blue (for general support of the cause), teal (for those whose loved ones struggle), and – poignantly – green (for those who’ve struggled personally).

As more students streamed in, many soon made their way to the bead table, lifting the decorative objects around their necks and identifying their own relationships with suicide. Some nodded and others smiled at those around them brandishing similar colors.

“The beads are such an important way to express your connection to the cause without having to vocalize it,” says Irizarry. “They allow for us to look around at each other and know we’ve had similar, shared experiences. There’s a lot of comfort in that.”

Following opening remarks by Irizarry and AFSP Eastern Massachusetts Associate Area Director Michele Lee, who’d aided to organizing the walk, Monica Marotta, a second-year ASL/English Interpreting major, took control of the mic to discuss her personal connection to suicide – the loss of her friend, Tom, who’d attended SUNY New Paltz with Marotta prior to her transferring to Northeastern, and her grieving process after his death by suicide.

As the sun rose and 10 a.m. rolled around, Irizarry took to a mic set up on the knoll and encouraged students to join her in a walk around campus. Accompanied by upbeat music playing from a portable mini speaker, she led attendees on a pre-arranged route that wove throughout the campus and streamed down the sidewalk of bustling Huntington Avenue, completing a circuit three times to reach an approximately three-mile length that AFSP has encouraged in all its Out of the Darkness Walks.

“I felt like all our hard work created a really moving and beautiful display of solidarity on campus,” says Irizarry, looking back on the walk itself.

When students reunited at Krentzman Quad, many chatting with friends and peers they’d encountered along the walk, Northeastern a cappella groups ascended atop the knoll for performances envisioned in line with the Walk’s overarching themes of strength, awareness, and perseverance. Distilled Harmony performed “Bird Set Free” by Sia, followed Pitch, Please! singing “The Lion, the Beast, the Beat” by Grace Potter and the Nocturnals.

“I think that having a cappella performers there was impactful because it showed their support and their personal ties to the cause,” says Chace. “We were happy to be able to have these performers there because they added a sense of light and hope to the event and showed how much then Northeastern community can come together to share their art and passion through a lens of mental health advocacy.”

Another group, the Unisons, sang an arrangement of “Safe Inside” by James Arthur, before the event’s final student speaker, fourth-year chemistry major Jenna Malley, took the stage. Speaking passionately and openly about her own loss – that of a close personal friend named Kennedy – Malley highlighted her work through the AMAZING Campaign (a grassroots effort she launched via AFSP’s website) to bring further awareness to suicide prevention and awareness of mental illness on college campuses.

With Malley’s speech concluded, a final a cappella group – the Nor’easters – came before the mic for an earnest arrangement of “September” by Earth, Wind, and Fire. For many members of that group, the event was keenly personal; a Nor’easter member died by suicide in 2015, leading the group to highlight suicide prevention publically and through fundraising efforts for AFSP.

As the closing notes of the performance rang out across the quad, Northeastern’s first Out of the Darkness Walk essentially concluded, with organizers coming before the mic to thank attendees before leaving students to mingle, converse, and eventually disperse.

“I could feel our Northeastern community coming together to talk and express passion for such an incredibly important cause that is often overlooked on this campus and in colleges across the country,” says Chace, looking back on the event. “I hope that we were able to spread our message about compassion and empathy, and that our community at Northeastern will become stronger and more transparent about mental health and suicide moving forward.”

For Irizarry, success in pulling off the walk felt simultaneously like the first step in a new chapter of mental health advocacy on campus. “My hope is that people feel more like there’s a space for them to discuss issues of mental illness and suicide,” she says. “It’s a small step but an important one, making sure people know there is a movement, and even though it might be in its first steps, I think that’s empowering.”

Northeastern students implement campus-centric mental health textline

Photo credit: https://lean0n.me/

For Northeastern students struggling with stress, anxiety, or any number of other common college-campus issues, a new resource could serve as a much-needed support.

The “Huntington” chapter of Lean on Me, an anonymous texting hotline founded last year at MIT, was rolled out in February by a group of Northeastern students concerned about a perceived shortage of mental health resources on campus.

The textline works by pairing those who want to talk to someone with specially trained peer supporters, all college students with more knowledge of the specific issues facing those in that age demographic than a supporter at an external, more broadly intended textline. Conversation are kept anonymous through a clever bit of technological innovation; the textline’s number serves as a go-between, meaning that supporters don’t see the user’s number, and the user does not see the supporter’s information.

Northeastern has received criticism for its lengthy waiting times between appointments; it can sometimes take weeks to see a counselor at University Health and Counseling Services, a mightily prolonged time to wait given that students are more likely to seek help under significant duress than before a mental health issue worsens to a dangerous degree. Lean on Me, while not qualified to handle the most serious of mental health issues (if a texter is suicidal, the conversation will be referred to the Samaritans hotline), seeks to serve as a useful, more immediate source of support for students.

15 students are currently qualified to staff the textline, but additional training will take place in coming semesters.

Boston-area colleges file amicus brief against Trump’s second immigration order

Seven Massachusetts colleges and universities made their opposition to the Trump administration’s continued attempts to implement a so-called “Muslim travel ban” known on Friday, joining a total of 31 schools across the nation in filing an amicus brief.

The brief, filed in the federal appeals court for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia (one of the courts that ruled against the ban), marks the second such legal action by universities in defense of nationals from six Muslim-majority nations, who under the attempted ban would be barred from entering the United States for 90 days.

“These individuals make significant contributions to their fields of study and to campus life by bringing their unique perspectives and talents to amici’s classrooms, laboratories, and performance spaces,” the brief read, adding that the executive order had indicated “from the highest levels of government, that discrimination is not only acceptable but appropriate.”

According to the brief, top educators and administrative figures at the colleges – which include Northeastern University, Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston University, Brandeis University and Tufts University – feel that the emergence of the ban, a legal manifestation of the Islamophobic, anti-immigrant rhetoric advocated by Trump on the campaign rhetoric, has impacted their ability to recruit global talent both in student and faculty populations.

The first ban, signed by Trump on Jan. 27, was shot down the following month by a court in Seattle, which criticized the ideology behind the bill in addition to its vague, sweeping wording. The most recent executive order, initiated March 6, was halted by a federal judge in Hawaii, who issued the decision hours before the ban would have gone into effect.

 

Coffeeshop Mapping: Temptations Cafe

Name: Temptations Cafe

Details:

313 Huntington Ave,
Boston, MA, 02115
http://places.singleplatform.com/temptations-cafe-2/menu
Phone: 617-266-6080

Hours:
Monday-Friday: 8 a.m. – 8 p.m.
Saturday: 10 a.m. – 7 p.m.
Sunday: 10 a.m. – 5 p.m.

Inside:

Located conveniently along Huntington Avenue by the Northeastern University stop on the Green Line, and across from Northeastern’s East Village dormitory, Temptations Cafe has long been a go-to destination for Huskies in search of a caffeine fix.

With its standard-issue, 12-oz drip coffee priced affordably at $2.25, and a menu stuffed with breakfast wraps and lunch sandwiches, it’s not that surprising to learn, via barista Anna Yuschenkoff, that the shop (one of two – another location has opened in Brookline) stays busy.

“It’s busiest especially when Northeastern kids get out of classes for lunch,” says Yuschenkoff, as – right on cue – a pack of six students rush through the doorway in hopes of securing lattes. At street level, the shop is both handicapped-accessible and extremely fortuitously placed for students on their way to the Marino gym and health center just a block up Huntington.

Yuschenkoff believes the atmosphere of the place plays a role in its popularity. “It’s relaxed and casual, but still good quality, which isn’t that common,” she says.

Temptations is compactly sized, with granite-tile flooring and polished wooden furniture. There are few outlets, which aligns with the barista’s perception of the coffeeshop as a via point for students, rather than a traditionally sit-down estbalishment. “Our customers are great,” Yuschenkoff says, juxtaposing them against the “grumpier” coffee aficionados who crowd nearby Starbucks and Dunkin’ Donuts locations throughout the day.

Caffeine fixes aside, customers can also feast on a variety of food items. Decadent “Sweet Temptations” options include peanut-butter-and-jam and nutella-and-banana sandwiches; those with less of a sweet tooth can go for salads, soups, cold sandwiches, cold wraps, or hot-off-the-press paninis that include options such as pesto chicken and fresh mozzarella. None of the options clock in at more than $10, a boast rival coffeeshop Pavement cannot claim to echo. Yuschenkoff’s personal favorite? “That’d be the hummus,” she says, laughing. “On everything. Or by itself. Just the hummus.”

Is UHCS’ short-term therapy approach failing students in the throes of mental health crisis?

Northeastern University’s approach to addressing students’ mental health concerns has become a major point of contention in the on-going race for SGA Student Body President and Vice President, with one pair of candidates (Suchira Sharma and Paulina Ruiz) calling for a reformation on on-campus resources to better assist students with pressing and recurring mental health concerns and their opponents (Josh Bender and Alex Grondin) instead advocating for an expansion of the referral system that instead pushes students to take advantage of off-campus resources. It’s clear that there’s significant disagreement on how to broach this campus-wide issue.

The vast majority of universities attempt to address students’ mental health concerns through on-campus counseling resources and referral services.Northeastern, in accordance with most inner-city colleges of comparable size, employs a “short-term therapy” model, which limits students to seeing a therapist for six to ten visits, or up to a semester, then refers them off-campus. It’s far from the only university to do so, but with surging demand for services forcing appointments to be spaced out to a month apart, though, semesters often run out before ten sessions can even take place.

And yet, referring students to off-campus professionals is not an all-encompassing solution either. Putting the burden of seeking help on students, many of who enter college with no experience setting up appointments of any kinds, creates a new set of challenges for those students. Whereas on-campus counselors almost never charge students for services, seeing professionals off-campus often comes at a steep financial cost, particularly if a student’s insurance isn’t accepted. For those on a shoestring budget, the idea of paying a therapist – per session and out-of-pocket – is too absurd to entertain.

A project that examines the crux of this issue – namely, what the responsibility of a college should be in treating the mental health concerns of its students – would be especially timely given the SGA race. In gathering information for the piece, I would attempt to contact Robert Klein (executive director of UHCS) and those in similar positions of authority at Boston University  (Judy Platt, director of BHS; and Carrie Landa, head of behavioral medicine) and Tufts (Julie S. Ross, director of CMHS) to get a sense of where all these universities stand on the issue of college mental health counseling, and potentially hold video interviews with them.

Behind the SMILE, an on-campus group dedicated to erasing stigma around mental illness on Northeastern’s campus, would also be a useful resource to turn to for information.

 

Examining Angus Johnston’s “Student Activism” blog

As far as blogs on student activism go, Angus Johnston’s StudentActivism.net ranks in the upper echelons of those I’ve sampled. It’s a strikingly articulate and neatly organized blog, one that feels every bit like the professional endeavor as which Johnon has treated it.

Comprehensive and well-researched, it explores every subject from trigger warnings in college campuses to benefit those with traumatic triggers that could intersect with classroom curricula to theoretical ponderings of potential shake-ups in electoral politics that could impact students at the local level.

As a WordPress blog, its format is somewhat constraining. There’s no immediately easy way to access the vast majority of Johnston’s writing and, given his history – the author is a historian who specializes in documenting student activism while also advocating for contemporary manifestations of student organizing across the United States – it would be useful to have a better-ordered version of this same site that would prioritize presenting more of his blogging.

That said, Johnston finds some interesting ways to engage with what seems to be a solidly sized audience. Offering 11,000 stickers that read “fight fascism” to readers in one post, and interacting with them on Facebook-linked comments the next, he’s an active presence in the consumption of his site’s material. With about 25,000 visits to his site last month (as per SimilarWeb), Johnston is likely fully aware that he has a small but interactive readership, and crafts his posts as such. Given the absence of blog posts, this appears to be a blog that also functions as a statement-of-purpose-style too – writing he’s done as a freelancer for an array of sites is showcased in a separate section of the site. With that understood, it makes sense that Johnston’s last comment, on a post titled “Fight Fascism.,” was on Feb. 17 – this is not a moneymaker so much as a labor of love, and as such he can post on it selectively.

 

At Tufts, contention over handling of Title IX policies

Over the weekend, the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate near-unanimously shot down a resolution posed by Students Advocating for Students (SAS) that would have altered the university’s handling  of Title IX cases, marking the latest salvo in an on-going conflict between campus senate and student group.

The proposal, brought by SAS President Jake Goldberg and Treasurer Edmund Tamas Takata, outlined suggestions for reforming Title IX procedures around the school’s Office of Equal Opportunity’s investigations of sexual misconduct, according to the Tufts Daily.

The resolution, the paper reported, specifically pushes to reduce the amount of influence a principal investigator has over an case’s course and outcome, expedites the timeline for investigations, and – in one point widely criticized by senate members – aims to remove both survivors of sexual assault and perpetrators from investigations and adjudications. Goldberg’s reasoning: that potential bias on the part of those with firsthand exposure to sexual misconduct could taint investigations.

Senators took issue with Goldberg’s vague assertions that his group had fielded complaints from unspecified individuals saying investigations were taking too long, his failure to connect with pertinent student groups before penning the resolution, and his admission that no survivors on campus had consulted on the bill.

One suggestion raised in the bill, opining for the investigators’ authority to be reworked into a hearing process decided on by both parties, was alleged by some senators to “protect perpetrators,” according to the Daily.

Goldberg later communicated to the Daily saying that several campus organizations had declined to work with him on the resolution.

Following a discussion of the resolution and Q&A session, senators voted 25-0 against the resolution, with one abstention.

TCU Senate President Gauri Seth made no secret of his frustrations regarding the resolution, telling the Daily:

“It’s egregious to bring a resolution forward regarding Tufts’ sexual misconduct policy that claims to protect both parties, when the authors of the resolution stated multiple times that they had not spoken to survivors on this campus.”

This is not the first time Goldberg and SAS have clashed with the TCU Senate.

Last November, the Tufts Daily reported that the organization advanced a resolution alleging that the university’s Sexual Misconduct Policy violated students’ freedom of speech through excessive vagueness in defining “sexual discrimination” and “sexual harassment.” Goldberg made the organization’s case on the back of the First Amendment, claiming that the existent policies did not provide enough guidelines for students to avoid such behaviors.

At that time, numerous Tufts community members and senators opposed the resolution, saying it threatened to strip from victims of sexual harsassment and discrimination protections and disciplinary recourse.

 

BU students, workers rally against Trump’s “corporate agenda”

Video Credit: The Daily Free Press

Marsh Chapel became a protest ground on Wednesday, March 1, as students and workers representing Boston University gathered to protest multiple aspects of the Trump administration, from ties to the fossil fuel industry to a demonstrated desire to further, in the words of protesters, “corporatize higher education.”

According to the Daily Free Press, approximately 100 protesters attended the rally, which was co-hosted by Divest BU, Massachusetts Interfaith Worker Justice, Make Boston University a Sanctuary School, and Student Labor Action Project at BU, all organizations that have been galvanized to action by stances taken by Trump’s White House.

Their goals? To push BU toward accepting “sanctuary campus” designation, divesting its endowment from the fossil fuel industry, and negotiating with faculty unions to improve conditions for faculty members and campus workers, as well as taking a more rigid stance about cracking down on instances of Islamophobia on campus.

One issue inflaming protesters was BU President Robert Brown’s recent refusal to hold a meeting with leaders of Divest BU, who’ve sent two members each day since January 31 to Brown’s office in hopes of engaging him face-to-face.

The group hopes to persuade members of BU’s Board of Trustees to divest endowment funds from the fossil fuel industry,  an agenda item that has been prominently thrust forward by fears of backward slides in addressing the climate change crisis following Trump’s election.

BU has taken some steps to address environmental concerns over the years, such as creating the Advisory Committee on Socially Responsible Investing (ACSRI) as well as (on that committee’s recommendation) a more recent task force, titled the Climate Action Plan, tasked with addressing ways to reduce energy use and actively aid in remedying environmental issues. However, BU has been loathe to take a firm stance against investments in the fossil fuel industry, only stating that it would endorse avoiding such investments on a “best efforts” basis, the Daily Free Press reported last month.

Divest BU has been dissatisfied with Brown’s response to their demands, explaining that the university has yet to incorporate one of the ACSRI’s proposals: divesting from “companies that continue to explore for fossil fuel reserves of any kind.”

At the rally, The Daily Free Press interviewed Masha Vernik, a BU sophomore and member of Divest BU, who said:

“I am not a profit margin, President Brown. I am a community member whose voice must be heard if we want this university to make the right decisions to benefit us and the world around us.”

Protesters pushed for progress on other issues plaguing BU’s campus. A speaker addressing amending BU’s current practice of negotiating semester-to-semester deals with adjuncts that don’t address disparities in course prices, and asked the university to address widely alleged unfair treatment of faculty and staff across campus.

The issue of “sanctuary campuses” has spread across the United States since the inauguration. Though such designation is largely symbolic, activists in favor of schools naming themselves “sanctuary campuses” for undocumented students and workers say that support of the movement conveys a willingness to defend such individuals targeted by  the administration’s discriminatory policies. BU currently lacks any policy designed to protect undocumented students and workers – a point protesters repeatedly addressed.

As Trump rescinds protections, colleges and students reaffirm transgender rights

As the Trump administration continues its assault on civil liberties for marginalized populations, students across the Boston area are rallying in defense of rights for various at-risk groups of Americans, among them Muslims, immigrants, and – over the past two weeks – the transgender community.

Last Wednesday, Feb. 22, the administration, overcoming initial opposition from Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, rolled back federal protections for transgender students that had previously safeguarded their ability to use whichever bathroom corresponded with their gender identity. The guidelines, enacted by preceding President Barack Obama in May in accordance with Title IX protections had been met with praise from the transgender community – and their retraction sparked protests across the country.

Students from Boston colleges were among the attendees at a rally in Post Office Square that formed the next evening and marched through Downtown Crossing, according to WHDH. Boston Public Schools Superintendent Tommy Chang released a statement supporting the rescinded “bathroom bill,” stating:

“While the federal government has rescinded its guidance protecting transgender students in our nation’s schools, transgender and gender nonconforming students in the Boston Public Schools will remain protected from discrimination, bullying and harassment.”

On university campuses, protest spread.

“I wish we didn’t have to tell the world that trans rights matter,” said Harvard student Sheehan D. Scarborough, director of the school’s Office of BGLTQ Student Life, to a dozens-strong crowd that gathered in Harvard Yard this past Monday, Feb. 27. As reported by the Harvard Crimson, the Harvard protest was organized by the school’s Trans Task Force and was intended as a cathartic expression of anger and dismay more than a concrete rally to further a policy response.

The Harvard Islamic Society and the Black Students Association, both also student groups at Harvard, joined in solidarity.

At Suffolk University, Acting President Marisa Kelly opined that the university would continue to support the bathroom bill despite Trump’s decision.

In the email, quoted by The Suffolk Journal, she wrote:

“While I am disappointed with the decision to roll the directive back, please be assured that the federal change will have no direct effect on students here at Suffolk, nor should it affect students while in Massachusetts.”

More protests are expected to take place in coming days across Boston-area campuses.

CC: Ludovic Bertron, Creative Commons.